I don't care for Pale Moon, but if you are happy using it that's all that should matter to youīTW, performance differences were visible to the naked eye-stuttering animation, dropped frame rates, and such. However, it goes to show Pale Moon developers aren't equipped the same way as Firefox (or Chromium and Opera) developers when it comes to optimizing their browser for speed. There are of course other factors you could compare the browser on, aside from whether they have full HTML5 support and their HTML5 performance. Epiphany and QupZilla performance couldn't be tested as their HTML5 support is inadequate. Midori and Pale Moon have similar incomplete HTML5 support, but show very poor performance as compared to the top three browsers. While Opera Developer beats Firefox performance by a hair's width, it doesn't have full HTML5 support. Pale Moon 24.6.2 3443 Doesn't support all HTML5 video formatĮpiphany 3.12.1 ? Doesn't support WebGL, aborts during later test Midori 0.5.8 3473 Doesn't support all HTML5 video format Opera DeveloDoesn't support all HTML5 video format In retrospect, your comments about Pale Moon make others on here think you know a lot about Pale Moon when in reality, you know very little about Pale Moon when compared against Firefox and what the developers do with Pale Moon performance wise since Pale Moon is now a true fork of Firefox (and not a clone). There's not much in the way of plugins or dev tools or sync functions, it's just a very fast browser. QupZilla has tabs, bookmarks and a built-in adblocker, but otherwise just handles being a light, fast web browser. Instead of making the "assumption" the developers of Pale Moon don't have experience doing performance tuning using the Firefox code, why don't you go over to the Pale Moon forums site, register for the site and ask one of the developers in a private message (and I suggest contacting the developer, Moonchild) and get the info "straight from the horses mouth" so to speak. QupZilla now is basically a modern version of what Firefox 1.0 was: a web browser that just does web browsing and bookmarks. Pale Moon for linux was first tested in August of 2013 and then released to the general linux public in January of 2014. Windows only Pale Moon made it's debut in October of 2009. Xenopeek wrote:I doubt Palemoon developers have experience doing performance tuning on the Firefox code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |